One and two are probably obvious to you if you, well, have a passing knowledge of football. After that it's pretty subjective, so here's the criteria I'm using (in no particular order or weight): value to team, youth, contract, and potential/upside. By value to team, I mean how many fewer games the team would win if an average player replaced him. I also went for a diversity of positions, so there wouldn't be 6 QBs here. Anyways here it is. Oh, and please let me know how stupid I am through the comments.